jacknewton.net
  • Featured Content
  • September14th

    Friends who compliment me on a photo I’ve taken will often hear the response, “Well, thanks, but photography is a lot like golf. Unless you’re Tiger Woods, there is always someone better.”

    Although I’ve learned a lot about photography over the years – how to harness the powerful capabilities of modern consumer cameras, how to compose an interesting shot, post processing in Photoshop, etc. – I see examples of superior technique and composition each and every day.

    Jim Reed/Barcroft Media

    Jim Reed/Barcroft Media

    Today I found a link to a gallery by Jim Reed, a storm chaser. A quick look at the gallery soon revealed that I have yet to a photo as exciting as Jim’s shown here. Amazing colors, a true sense of the photographer being in the scene (with the associated danger of being so close to such extreme weather).

    I would love to be witness to an event worthy enough to photograph and be of interest to a wide audience. For this reason, I tend to carry a camera with me most of the time, just in case that day brings me witness to something of importance. It hasn’t happened yet, maybe it never will. I certainly won’t be spending time and money chasing storms like Jim Reed does, but I’m glad he’s doing it.

    Photo by Steve Alexander

    Steve Alexander

    Time and place make so much difference, in so many ways. My friend Steve has taken a couple of photos which blow me away. His photo of a mandrill at the Houston zoo, baring its teeth, is worthy of National Geographic, and I believe he was asked by the zoo to have it included in their newsletter.

    It’s the reason I like to talk about photography with other enthusiasts. Just discussing each other’s efforts, organizing photo shoots to try out techniques, learning from each other – these all combine to help me feel as if I’m progressing as a photographer.

    I’d like to think that someday I’ll be in exactly the right place and time to capture an image as powerful as some of the ones I see from other photographers which I admire. No matter what, time spent learning is never wasted, and I expect improved results from the types of shots I current take – mostly portraits, nature, events.

    I’m also planning on using Zack Arias’ excellent DIY tutorial on seamless white backgrounds to take a series of photos very soon, further honing my skills with effective and creative lighting. I’ve already seen an improvement in my professional video work from working on my lighting techniques for my hobby. Steve and I have discussed a trip in the future solely for the purpose of shooting and testing our abilities.

    The lesson? Photography, as with so many other things, can be a life long learning opportunity, if that’s your interest.

  • September10th

    Although I spend a fair bit of time trying to hone my skills with a camera, the reason I got into photography in the first place was to have fun. I started off by taking pictures of my family and friends, and beginning with my first SLR back in the 1980′s, I experimented with “trick” photography, such as:

    • In a completely dark room, leaving the shutter open and walking around the room flashing things with color gels to get multiple images exposed in one image
    • Using Cokin filters to alter the scene which I saw through the viewfinder
    • Using perspective to create images which otherwise did not exist

    I saw a set of funny perspective shots today and thought I’d share the link (The site, Environmental Graffiti, has some excellent, more serious photography, too, by the way).

    They immediately made me think about a trip to visit my friend Tom out in South Dakota almost 25 years ago. We went to see Mount Rushmore, and I had him lie on his back and shoot a photo of me with my head placed next in line to the four Presidents. (I’m searching for my old photo albums to see if I can find the shot and will scan it and post it here later if I can do so.) I was cracking myself up as he lay there, looking at me as if I were nuts.

    So take a moment for some whimsy, and think of how you can create your own perspective shots. It doesn’t take a special camera, just a bit of imagination.

  • September4th

    Frankencamera is here. Researchers at Stanford are “out to reinvent digital photography with the introduction of an open-source digital camera, which will give programmers around the world the chance to create software that will teach cameras new tricks.”

    Computational photography is an emerging field of study, in which researchers are working hard to allow programmers the potential of creating new ways to extend the possibilities of what powerful digital cameras can accomplish.

    This article from the Stanford University News site, is very interesting, interesting if you’re a camera geek, that is. Imagine having a digital camera not limited in it’s functions by the software provided by the manufacturer. The article provides several real-world applications for such possibilities:

    Extending Dynamic Range – HDR photos are all the rage right now in the world of digital photography. In a nutshell, you take several versions of the same photo using different exposure levels, and then combine them to create a single composition in which every pixel is lit perfectly. Unfortunately, most HDRs you’ll see are more in the line with abstract art rather than the subtle use of exposure to optimally light each pixel. No matter what your intent would be, open source photography may offer is the ability to take extended dynamic range photos on-demand rather that in the digital darkroom with tools such as Photoshop and Photomatix.

    Video Resolution Enhancement – computational photography offers the possibility of creating higher resolution video from traditionally low resolution cameras, by interspersing high resolution still shots periodically and allowing algorithms to recombine them into a higher quality final product.

    One of the more interesting, and perhaps dismaying, aspects is the potential to allow just about anyone to take a high quality photograph by leveraging photos of the same scene which have been taken before, and shared on a network.

    Imagine someone standing in front of a commonly photographed scene – let’s say the Eiffel Tower. Using the principles of computational photography, if the camera was connected to a network, it could potentially analyze highly-rated photos of the same scene and use the exact same settings as those who had taken the shot before. You could significantly lessen the chances of taking a poor shot, but at the same time, you’d also increase the sheer number of instances of the exact same photo. Why not just download the photo someone else took and go get an espresso instead of standing around taking photos?

    It’s interesting to think about how digital cameras have incredible power, but most users don’t have a clue how to harness them. Basic operation is often alien to people who’ve spent hundreds of dollars on very nice cameras, so I doubt they’ll be the target audience of open source photography.

    Ultimately it will be the geeks who get excited about extending their equipment beyond the manufacturer’s software, so I suppose my fears of endless duplicates of a scene, right down to tone, shadows, etc. are unfounded.

    Heck, it’s not like there aren’t a billion shots of the Eiffel Tower as is. What’s a few billion more?

  • August25th

    My friend Steve, a talented photographer amongst other things, sent me an article topic idea the other day. He wanted to talk about how the availability, and more importantly, the affordability of high pixel cameras has changed the nature of photography. His basic premise is that by allowing photographers to capture such great expanse and detail, it gives them the ability to create several different compositions from the same shot, much more so with each new generation of powerful cameras.

    Steve sent me two examples to help illustrate his point. On a recent trip to northern California, he took a photo of a water garden replete with lilies and wildlife:

    safrog1

    The photo composed as taken is interesting, lots of colors and shapes to attract the viewer’s eye, but the high resolution allowed Steve to crop and zoom in on one small segment:

    safrog2

    For my tastes, the second composition is much more interesting, driving deep into the details of the frog and the lily pad on which he sits. Beyond the obvious appeal of the photo, I love the red corona around the lily pad and the way the clarity of the water makes it appear as if the frog and pad are floating in air.

    Steve’s point is well-taken, I think. No doubt, accomplished photographers will always try to ensure an interesting composition when they press the shutter release, but high resolution photography allows so much creativity in the virtual darkroom that a single capture can produce multiple worthy final compositions.

    Applying the principle of the “rule of thirds” to segments of a large image using tools such as Photoshop or Lightroom, photographers can now take a potentially different tack when composing their shots, or at the very least, spend more time examining the outcomes to look for other interesting compositions beyond what they envisioned when they looked through their viewfinders the first time.

    Steve’s Flickr portfolio has lots of interesting photos he’s taken all over the world, I encourage you to check them out and comment. He has taken several photos I’m in awe of, but two of my favorites are:

    Poser
    and
    Brooklyn Bridge

  • August21st

    I read a funny article in Wired today about their “Top Ten Photography Peeve’s”, and I have to admit, I agree to large extent.

    It’s not a long article and it’s supposed to be humorous, so I won’t just repost it here, but I’d like to talk briefly about one of the article’s points – Rock Concert Strobage.

    Stop taking photos and just listen!

    Stop taking photos and just listen!

    What that means is people using flash at concerts trying to take pictures of the band. Next to my number one annoyance at concerts – people who spend the whole time talking to each other and have to shout because, you know, there’s a BAND playing nearby – the whole phenomena of people whipping out their cell phone or point-and-shoot cameras at shows drives me nuts. You can’t go to a show anymore without a sea of arms up in the arm, taking endless poor quality shots.

    Do people even go to listen to the music anymore?

    So here is a basic primer on how to take a photo at a music show. Hopefully you’ll be happy with one of your first efforts and put the phone/camera back in your pocket and let me enjoy the show.

    1. Turn off your flash. This is the number one mistake people make. Yes, it’s dark, but your flash only illuminates for about 7 – 10 feet. If you aren’t standing right at the stage, it’s not going to help, unless you want a very brightly lit shot of the backs of the heads of the people standing in front of you. The lights from the stage are what you are going to have to use, not your flash.

    2. Stand still or put your camera on something steady. Since you’re not using a flash, your camera is going to slow down its shutter to allow as much light as possible into the shot. This means if you move at all, your photo will be blurry. Find a spot near the edge of the crowd where you can place your camera on a flat, steady surface.

    3. Use the timer. Most point and shoots have a self timer feature. Learn how to use it and when you need to take low light shots like this, use it. Even just pressing the shutter button can move your camera enough to cause blur, so find that level spot, set the self timer, and step back.

    Using these tips will help you get the best possible shot from your camera, but be forewarned, it still probably won’t be anything great. Concert photography is an advanced technique, requires expensive low light lenses, and is best left to the professionals. I’ve had a few assignments to shoot concerts in my life, and I’ve gained a great appreciation for those who do it well.

    My advice is go to the shows to hear the band, and look online for high quality photos later.

  • August19th

    My wife and I have been involved in technology since we first were married and both working in the Boston area in the late 1980′s. Veek, in fact, worked for several years at Bolt, Beranek and Newman (BBN), a company then on the forefront of the development which led to today’s internet and ultimately, the World Wide Web.

    I’ve watched the internet take gigantic leaps over the past twenty-odd years, seen the browser wars, the search wars, the OS wars, etc. I remember Google being a beta application released by two nerds from California, and seen it grow into a powerful scary monolith with immeasurable impact on global business. I’ve seen massive investments in fiber optics and routing and packet-switching and network monitoring and countless other supporting technologies which enable companies to move operations to the internet. I’ve surfed the wave of internet booms, and wiped out in internet busts – from dot.com to dot.bomb.

    Along the way, I’ve been forever impacted by some of what I’ve seen. As in life, internet usage in general has its peaks and valleys – for every positive image or piece of information, there is a corresponding negative one. Disturbing imagery runs the gamut from weirdo porn to “in the moment”, real time reporting unfettered by editorial guidelines inherent in traditional news services. Humor abounds, if not always to my tastes. Whole sites dedicate themselves to “memes“, forever enshrining them in a digital time capsule. “Bert is Evil”, “LOLcats”, “JibJab” – the list is quite endless, and it’s rare that anyone with a computer and internet connection hasn’t seen a significant number of these.

    bananaYet even with this saturation of information, every now and then something appears which amazes me, perhaps this is the true genius and power of today’s internet. Recently, after almost 50 years of eating bananas, I was sent a link to a YouTube video showing me a new way to open a banana. Apparently mimicked after the way apes open them in the wild, this technique allows one to open a banana without squishing one end. (I’ll have to take their word on the ape technique thing, my ill-fated excursion to see the mountain gorillas of Rwanda prevents me from personal verification. A story for another time, perhaps.)

    Here’s the link. I know, I know, given the impact of the global computing explosion, how can opening a banana a new way be so memorable? I can’t answer that question, it just is.

    For whatever reason, the great leveling effect of information overload reduces everything to an even keel. Imagine if this were true in the late 1960′s when television brought us video of astronauts landing on the moon. As dramatic and impactful as that event was, if it happened today with the flood of content being served, would it be considered just as interesting as watching Mentos being dropped into Diet Coke? Unfortunately, my entirely unscientific conclusion is “Yes”.

    Another unfortunate aspect of the internet enabling the rapid creation and dissemination of content is the ease of producing and distributing uninformed, incorrect, and outright fake material. The effect on the American political process is palpable at this point, and invested entities are noticing. From the cartoonishly fake emails I receive from (generally) friends and family of the generation proceeding mine (“Obama won’t say the Pledge of Allegiance!”), to “news” sources which eschew such principles as “fact finding” and “independent verification” in the quest for the heavenly manna of internet reporting – Be The First.

    All of this just provides fuel to the leveling effect. Truth and fiction are blurred. Legions of people honestly believe that our President wishes to send troops to their homes to confiscate their guns. Perhaps thousands of people believe that conservative screecher Anne Coulter was once, and may still be, a man in drag. Images which should horrify us such as the Abu Ghraib conditions come and go along with counter-productive discussions of Hillary Clinton’s “cankles”.

    The only way for me to successfully navigate this morass of information overload is to maintain a healthy cynicism about almost everything which reaches my eyes. Developing a network of trusted sources can be arduous, but it’s entirely possible. I only know that looking away won’t last, and won’t assist in separating good from bad, truth from fiction.

    Sorry, I must cut this short now. Someone just sent me a photo of baby hedgehogs, while another has a video of someone screaming “Nazi” at a congressman. Must go…..

  • August12th

    Stark, black and white photos taken in a Brazilian insane asylum are featured in a powerful James Estrin article today in “Lens”, the photojournalism blog of the NY Times:

    http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/12/showcase-33/

    Photo by Claudio Edinger

    Photo by Claudio Edinger

    The photographer, Claudio Edinger, was inspired to visit the asylum after watching his grandmother deteriorate from Alzheimer’s disease, and the resulting photo essay is jarring.

    I love the power of photography in situations such as this, where the content truly rules. The photos are not heavily stylized, they don’t rely upon elaborate techniques or sophisticated lighting.

    Using simple equipment and effective composition, Edinger’s photos give the viewer “punch to the stomach” insight into lives of people all but forgotten.

    The availability of powerful, affordable cameras and lenses, post-production tools such as Photoshop, and especially free online galleries such as Flickr, have allowed photography to fairly explode in the past decade. The capacity to capture a quality image has expanded to include just about anyone with a passing interest in photography, but essays such as Edlinger’s ably illustrate the difference between merely taking pictures and telling a story with photos.

  • August10th

    These prophetic words were spoken to me by Veek as she and the kids pulled away from the house on their way to the north Texas area for some college tours. I imagined her thinking “I have to drag these kids up to Dallas for three days while he sits there in his underwear and eats chips watching TV.”

    [In the spirit of full disclosure, last night I did eat some chips and watch my beloved Sox get swept by the Yankees, enduring taunting text messages from Basile the whole time. But by 10:30 the game's outcome was ordained and I decided to turn in and get some rest in preparation for a busy week ahead.]

    Fat chance.

    10:30 p.m. – Dogs went out for their last “business time” of the evening. Brought them in at 10:45 after Bella (the dog we’re taking care of while she meets the Australian rabies program requirements) and Fenway (our 5 month old puppy) started barking like crazy, as they always do. Put Bella and Fenway into their respective crates, brought Scout into the bedroom with me, and laid my head on the pillow.

    11:30 p.m. – Fenway whining to go out. I get up, let just her out, and wait by the door for her to do her “business time” and come back in. She appears out of the darkness and lies down in the grass about 15 feet from the porch. “Come on, Fenway, let’s go back to bed.”…. “Come one girl, come inside.”…. Nothing. Just a stone faced puppy looking at me and not budging. I give up and just close the door, and go lie down for a bit while she stays outside, knowing full well that I can’t go back to sleep because she will soon enough start barking either at a random noise or to announce her desire to come inside.

    11:40 p.m. – There it is. “Woof.” “Woof.” “Woof!” I trudge to the porch and she’s sitting right there. These were “Let me in.” barks, not “Hey, what’s that random noise?” barks. Back to her kennel she goes, and I shuffle down to the bedroom muttering.

    Fenway and Bella Destroy Something12:43 a.m. – “Whine.” “Whine.” “Whine!” You’ve got to be kidding me. I fall out of bed, and go to Fenway’s kennel to let her out. She fairly bolts to the door, this is serious. We do the dance again. I wait. I call her. She appears but lies down in the grass instead of coming in. This time, being the more advanced species, I devise a plan. “Scout! Here, Scout!” Our 9 year old comes bounding along, ever hoping to please me. “Go outside Scout.” She readily agrees and runs out. I see her and Fenway in the yard, sniffing and milling about. I give it about three minutes, open the door and start calling for them to return. Of course, Scout comes immediately, but no sign of Fenway. My cunning plan has not worked. Plan B is to use the training aid – a clicker we use to signify successful completion of a command, followed by a treat. “Come on Fenway!” [click] It works! The Pavlovian response is validated, as Fenway comes loping to the door, hoping for the post-click treat her brain has convinced her is coming.

    Good luck with that, Fenway. You’ve woken me twice now, there’s no way in doggie heaven I’m giving you a treat at this point. Get in that kennel and shut the heck up.

    6:20 a.m. – “Whine.” “Whine.” “Whine!” Ugh. I stare at the clock, do a quick calculation, and decide [not like I have a choice anyway] that less than six hours of quiet is what I’m getting tonight. I let her and Bella out of their kennels, put them outside, and go lie down, awaiting the inevitable. “Yip!’ Yip!” “Yip!” “Woof.” “Woof.” “Woof!” Obviously they’ve found some important reason to announce their presence to every neighbor within a few hundred yards, and seeing as it’s 6:20 in the morning, their voices carry loud and clear. I hustle to the door and call them back inside.

    This time, due to the routine well-established by Veek’s early morning walking, they both come immediately and await their morning repast. I briefly consider starving them both for the three days, but relent and fill three bowls with kibble, clean and refill the big water bowl, and head back to the bedroom for what I hope is 30 minutes of ‘snooze’ time.

    Ummm, no.

    Within a few minutes, I hear a sound. Not a normal sound. A sound which says “You’d better go find out what that sound is.” A five month old puppy with a history of chewing things not intended to be chewed demands vigilance, so off I go again. I find Fenway in the kitchen, ignoring her bowl of food but furiously tearing into something. What is that?! I go up to her, grab her muzzle and pry open her jaws. It’s a five dollar bill. Great, now my dog is eating money in a quite literal sense.

    If only she were exhibiting the signs of becoming a canine ATM, but no, obviously someone had left the bill lying around and she decided it would be a better use of her time than actually eating the expensive puppy chow carefully placed in her dish next to the clean and crisp bowl of water. Whatever.

    6:45 a.m. – I give up. I’m not going to get any more rest this morning. The three dogs are in the kitchen/family room playing. Fenway is chasing Bella back and forth between the two rooms. Their paws scrabble on the hard floors, the panting is audible. I may as well just start my day.

    I do the dog training, having each dog sit, lie down and jump up. [Click] – treat. [Click] – treat.

    I empty the dishwasher and drainboard, and clean the few dirty dishes, and fold the laundry from the dryer.

    I take the final step to end any hope of morning rest by turning on my computer and start reading mail.

    “Enjoy the peace and quiet.” Yeah, right.

  • July27th

    Old As New

    Posted in: Photography

    There’s an interesting article in this week’s Newsweek regarding the burgeoning resurgence in Polaroid images, both real and simulated. Andrew Romano writes about the phenomena in his article “Instant Karma“.

    I particularly liked this observation by Romano: “… I suspect that the … Polaroid resurrection actually reflects a latent uneasiness with the changing role of photography in our culture… … the Information Age isn’t replacing old objects with new ones. It’s using 1′s and 0′s to get rid of objects altogether. As larger swaths of our lives become immaterial, we tend to rely upon computers to preserve or reproduce (or simply promote) the esthetics of the more tangible technologies they’re displacing.”polaroid

    While I was never a Polaroid camera aficionado, I did have an Olympus film SLR for years with which I dutifully tried out new techniques and spent countless hours (and dollars) getting prints made. I remember distinctly the frustrations of having spent money on sub-par prints which ended up sitting in a shoe box in perpetuity because they weren’t good enough to be placed in my albums for others to view.

    The digital camera revolution only heightens that awareness – I usually discard up to 80% of my shots, and for truly experimental technique efforts, I’m sure the percentage creeps up well into the high 90′s. The freedom to fire away without consideration of cost is the single most obvious difference between the film and digital photographic worlds. The ability to post-process with Photoshop instead of a dark room full of environmentally-suspect chemicals is perhaps the second most-obvious aspect.

    I’m not immune to the desire to produce “old timey” looking photos with new fangled equipment, however. I’ve purchased a 1950′s-era box camera and built a contraption (the official term used for such a device) which allows me to take digital images “Through The Viewfinder” (TTV) of the old camera. My smallish TTV gallery on Flickr shows how this technique – replete with imperfect focus, spotty glass and more – produces various effects of interest to fans of the genre.

    I suppose this means I agree at least in part with Romano, in that I possess a desire to remember the past. I still listen to my old cassette tapes occasionally, with their lackluster audio fidelity, and eagerly view galleries of TTV-, Holga- and Polaroid- effect photos. Lately I’ve been chatting with fellow Rhode Island natives about iconic places and foods of years gone by. Perhaps it’s merely a sign of age or perhaps I’m riding the crest of a new wave of digital nostalgia.

    I prefer the latter.

  • July26th

    I’ve been doing some work for a client based in the Boston area, helping make timely updates to a site they manage. The site is El Hogar, and their stated mission is “to assist in the improvement of social and educational conditions in Honduras…” by providing “a loving home and education in a Christian environment for abandoned, orphaned and hopelessly poor children, enabling them to fulfill their ultimate potential as productive human beings in Honduras.”

    elhogarNormally elhogar.org seems like a typical small business site, with updates designed to inform interested parties and potentially attract further support, but with the political upheaval in Honduras lately, the updates are more frequent and much more tilted towards the conditions being dictated by the turmoil.

    As I make the edits – sometimes daily, sometimes weekly – it’s hard not to be affected by the “man on the scene” nature of the updates coming from the Honduran capital of Tegucigalpa. Reverend Richard Kunz is alternately concerned, sarcastic, bemused, befuddled and most often optimistic in his posts, not shying away from providing eyewitness details but always focused on the mission of the school.

    The updates aren’t long, and they bring the international news stories about Honduras into further clarity for me, so it’s been pretty interesting the past month or so. I do hope that the violence ends and that people can feel safer soon, however.